Question:
It all comes down to...Macbook or HP?
anonymous
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
It all comes down to...Macbook or HP?
Eighteen answers:
isl247
2008-06-23 17:21:57 UTC
There is no shortage of software for OS X. Don't let anybody try to tell you otherwise. With the exception of a few games there's nothing you can't do.
J. E
2008-06-23 17:13:33 UTC
I think the way to go is MacBook. But really you are looking more at the operating system, which I still would go with the OSX Leopard on the MacBook, your brother said that 99% of programs are created for Windows/PC, but I believe that something like 95% of those are also avalible for Macs. Besides you have a lot of apple software anyway. Macs are are not "just for designing", if you like to create movies, look at pictures, listen to music, or even if you play an instrument, you can hook it up and record a song using garageband, and put it directly onto your iPhone. If I were you I would go with the MacBook.
kmm333
2008-06-23 17:09:53 UTC
MACBOOK!! lol ya for sure. my hp just died. i bought it a year and a half ago. peice of .....! with apple, you have the apple care protection plan which i highlt recommend. no matter what happens, theyll fix and replace it. ok thats the companies. now lets compare the operating systems. Mac osx 10 leopard. UNBELIEVABLE. everything is seamless and simple. great graphics and effects. windows vista- total failure. slow as anything, resource hog, horrible on battery life. macs last about 5 hours! My hp lasted 3 if i was lucky. about installing programs- there is always an alternative to a program that is compatible with mac- many companies also has mac versions of theyre programs. worst comes to worst, you can install windows on your mac! so easy, takes about 30 minutes to install, and u have the best of both worlds! and theres a program that even lets u switch between leopard and windows without rebooting. its called parallels. enjoy!
techtipper
2008-06-23 17:06:27 UTC
you don't have to choose. with macs these days, you can install both windows and Mac OSX using the delivered bootcamp software.



you can also use virtualization software (you have to pay for them) like Parallels or VMWare Fusion to run Windows even inside Mac's OS X operating system.



Note that you have to buy your own copy of windows. I recommend Windows XP Pro (over Vista) as it's more stable. You should buy XP Pro before they stop making it (it will be retired soon from retail, only to be sold pre-installed via dell or other pc makers).
niiro13
2008-06-23 17:23:15 UTC
The only reason why anyone would stick to PC is for the games, exchange server, and the office tools (like Publisher, Access, etc.).



And no, I'm not counting torrents. If you really bought all your software, then those are pretty much the only reasons why you'd use PC...and maybe a couple more I haven't thought of.



99% is heavily exaggerated. probably 70% of programs are created for PC (1% being Linux, etc.) out of the 70%, 25% of those have been ported to Mac, and 50% of the 70% can be run under Crossover.



And of course you can install Windows on the Macbook if you really needed it.



reason for editing: I forgot about the tons of apps that are Mac only.
anonymous
2008-06-23 17:06:47 UTC
I'd say go with the Mac because you could always by the Parallel and Windows XP software and download them onto your Macbook. This way you'd have access to both Mac and Windows programs. Good luck.
yankee625625
2008-06-23 17:05:58 UTC
i would choose the mac i just personally like Mac's better







http://www.pspguru.wordpress.com
Mina
2008-06-23 17:03:50 UTC
MACBOOK!
nickie
2016-05-24 02:27:10 UTC
But we're not God's customers--we're His children. That's a big difference. Read the story of the Prodigal Son--I think it's in Luke--at our worst, God forgives and accepts us as His children (not servants, customers, etc.) That's why Jesus came to earth--to offer us a way to regain our relationship with God through grace and forgiveness and to adopt us into His family.
anonymous
2008-06-24 08:21:06 UTC
hi,

your brother is wright and so are you they are both good computers but if you ask me i would have went for the macbook because 1 you have programs and stuff for it and you have an iphone but scince you are the one going to get it then you have to chose for yourself witch one is better for you?!
anonymous
2008-06-23 17:50:06 UTC
I personally wouldn't chose a computer to match my phone. More like the other way arround, but to each his own. Here's some info I gathered recently that I hope can help you pick one.



For Vista, look at the MS requirements…and double it at least and make sure it's certified. Triple if you can afford…then Vista should rock your socks. If you learn how to use it, Vista features and technology blows XP away…when it works. ;) You want it to last so get 64-bit Vista Home Premium or Ultimate.



But if you have old programs, they might not work (esp. with 64-bit version). Google “Vista compatibility list”. Knowing a bit about computers helps getting the old problematic ones to work (Internet has a lot of solutions that smart people share).



Ultimate is the best but if you don’t think you need anything that fancy, Home Premium is good too. Get a good video card if you want Aero graphics (at least 256MB 128-bit in the newer cards). Better if you can afford.



Recent release of Service Pack 1 made things better and more compatible with hardware. Unfortunately, Microsoft marketing made people think it will work with old computers but it’s very risky so that’s why there are so many problems. It’s too far ahead in technology and requires new hardware and too many manufacturers sell cheap computers that don’t run Vista good.



Vista uses extra RAM to store commonly used files in a new activity known as “disk caching”. The computer determines which files will be accessed most and copies it to RAM (where it is much faster than accessing your hard disk). This includes components of the programs you use on a regular basis. When you need more RAM for programs you launch, etc. the computer purges the “least likely used” files from RAM to make room for the new program. That’s why if you look at the performance monitor, Vista always has near zero “free” RAM. So in theory, the more RAM (for disk cache) you have, the faster your computer will operate. This can also be done to a lesser effect with a USB flash drive with a technology called ReadyBoost.

http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/archive/2007/03/29/windows-vista-superfetch-readyboost.aspx



Vista Home Premium and Ultimate has Media Center, where with a TV card/USB adapter (if not integrated) of the type that fits your TV, acts similar to an advanced TiVo. You can play your videos, schedule recordings, etc. As an added bonus, you can get a wireless keyboard / mouse or gyro-mouse and it will be sort of like remote control.



Deals of America and Tech Bargains catch good deals on HP and Dell’s and sometimes you can get like $500 off! XPBargains has deals on Tablet PC’s!

http://www.dealsofamerica.com/

http://www.techbargains.com/

http://www.xpbargains.com/best_deal.php/tablet_pc_deals.htm





Unless you are an artist, most Universities (and programs) as well as the rest of the world use Windows. WinMacs are popular (of the 7% of Mac users…5 of 7 are WinMac’ers). Google “marketshare hitslink 11”. But for the price, Macs don’t run Windows as well as other brands.



Macs are durable because many have an accelerometer in there that can "increase the chance" of saving your hard drive when you drop it. Like those used in airbags. The power cord is also magnetically attached so it reduces the chance that you yank it off the table.



OSXMacs can exclusively install Final Cut Pro (which is good for media work). Adobe CS is also good and available for Windows but works better on OSX. The Windows version actually looks like an OSX port.



Most Mac users eventually use Windows on it however (of the 7% of Mac users…5 out of 7 are WinMac’ers). I would suspect that many OSX keepers are artists as usual. Emotion workers are generally not as good with computers as logic workers so OSX's are good for them.



Windows runs better on windows machines of course, but sometimes it doesn't really matter that much to most users.



Mac Pros:

OSX stability

OSX is easy to use

Dual-bootable to Windows

More durable than many brands

Trendy



Mac Cons:

Not as much peripheral support

Not as much software support

Windows doesn’t run as good

Expensive

Minority: currently Only 7% use Macs [2% OSX, 5% WinMac] (91% use Windows PC)



Windows PC Pros:

More customizable

More choices

More styles

Cheap hardware

Vista has best gaming capability (Direct3D 10)



Windows PC Cons:

Less stable (unless you are an IT pro)

Many are relatively not as fashionable

Not as user-friendly

Some extra features in Windows requires advanced knowledge to use

The extra features require better hardware despite your use of them or not



Details of features can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X



Some brand statistics: In terms of recent sales, the top 3 manufacturers are HP, Dell, and Acer (Gateway). Apple is #4 in USA.

http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/04/24/mac-q1-2008-market-share-3-26-percent-worldwide-6-26-percent-in-the-us.aspx



Pretty good deal on a powerful laptop:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834101154
Mike M
2008-06-23 17:26:32 UTC
In my opinion, that's a bit like choosing between cake and AIDS. :P Your brother's 99% figure is obviously a gross overstatement, and a sizeable portion of it is comprised of the world's malware. The Mac platform is growing at many times the rate of Windows, mainly because people are beginning to realize what a sham Windows is in comparison. iPhone development has already exploded (and the App Store hasn't even opened yet), and since Macs are used to write iPhone apps using the same development tools, languages and (almost the same) APIs that are used to create full OS X desktop apps, more developers are getting interested in Mac development as well. The quantity of software available for a platform is not what matters, the quality of it is, and OS X software generally whoops Windows software in that regard. Simply put, the Mac has a far brighter future than Windows ever had. Buying a Windows PC is an investment in the past; buying a Mac is an investment in the future, and you can run Windows on it anyway. :P
Dariel
2008-06-23 17:15:26 UTC
Yes the majority of software are created for PC. Iphone software should be compatible with PC too. For example you can use Ipod software just find on PC i would think Iphone would work similarly.



When you mean ''doesn't exactly flow'' your PC may be older with less performance, i recently got a new HP laptop and noticed Itunes opened up significantly faster due to the better processor ram etc.



The only time i've used a mac was for writing music and designing so i would say your brothers right, however seeing as the majority of the world have PCs im sure there are designing software for PCs, people wouldnt buy Macs for one purpose.
Hijr21
2008-06-23 17:08:14 UTC
Macbooks are overpriced.

If your iphone doesn't work well with your pc, it's iTunes, not the PC.

I would go with the HP laptop, unless you need MAC OS X.
Ellen B
2008-06-23 17:05:14 UTC
PC!

Please answer this

https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20080623164233AAXFhf9
Mowis
2008-06-23 17:04:40 UTC
USER FRIENDLY = MAC

COMPUTER USER WHO WANTS TO TELL THE COMPUTER WHAT TO DO NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND = HP
lilcoco24
2008-06-24 08:08:47 UTC
prolly hp i have one it is awesome!!!!!! lol dat the one i would say.
climber
2008-06-23 17:04:57 UTC
i love my macbook it is so fast


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...