2009-04-21 15:16:14 UTC
Personally I think Microsoft should have used windows 7 home basic, but they scraped that months ago.
With windows 7 I can see that three program limit could turn users to look into Linux-based operating systems, especially after windows xp stops shipping.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/163416/is_windows_7_for_netbooks_a_nonstarter.html
Personally what would you prefer a full operating system or an operating systems the limits what you do? I was considering of getting a netbook with windows 7, but now after this. I am just going to stay with ubuntu.
As I sometimes have my IM client, web browser, word processor, and sometimes a media player or some other program all up and running at the sametime and not in the background..
I am not getting windows xp because they are dropping the support and very insecure compared to the other operating systems of windows vista/7, mac, and linux-based.
PS: Mac might never enter the netbook market thanks to Steve jobs saying "we don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk, and our DNA will not let us ship that"