Question:
which is better operating system comparing to windows vista or windows xp?
anonymous
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
which is better operating system comparing to windows vista or windows xp?
Ten answers:
anonymous
2008-07-08 05:47:20 UTC
Windows XP is a way better operating system. I work in the IT department where I work and we alway down grade our new bought systems to XP.
anonymous
2008-07-08 04:21:14 UTC
Don't listen to those XP fanatics and backward people. If you're getting a new computer then go Vista. XP is discontinued last week too, btw. Think of it this way...Windows 95 is faster than either...catch my drift?



And despite some minor "interface designs"...Vista is really a TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE. It blows both XP and OSX away in this regard if you knew what you are reading. It just looks like a "pretty OS" on the surface. Check Wikipedia for the real deal on Vista, XP and OSX and make your own decision.



If you have an old computer, or a work computer that requires XP, then maybe you should put XP on it. Or if you can only afford a cheap computer etc... Otherwise, you're better off in the long run with Vista.



Here's some info that will help you decide. Note that Vista will only work on new computers well and it was "ahead of it's time" such that it causes a lot of problems with old computers that can't handle it.



For Vista, look at the MS requirements…and double it at least and make sure it's certified. Triple if you can afford…then Vista should rock your socks. If you learn how to use it, Vista features and technology blows XP away…when it works. ;) You want it to last so get 64-bit Vista Home Premium or Ultimate. It’s mega-fast with 64-bit apps as well as lets you upgrade > 4GB TOTAL RAM (system RAM + graphics card + other devices). 64-bit also requires “MS approved” (a.k.a. digitally signed) drivers so this “might” help with hardware compatibility, etc. This is MS’s way of trying to get everyone to “move on” if they are able to.



But if you have old programs, they might not work (esp. with 64-bit version). Google “Vista compatibility list”. Knowing a bit about computers helps getting the old problematic ones to work (Internet has a lot of solutions that smart people share).



Ultimate is the best but if you don’t think you need anything that fancy, Home Premium is good too. Get a good video card if you want Aero graphics (at least 256MB 128-bit in the newer cards)… better if you can afford. Vista technology distributes more graphics processing to the video card and relieves the CPU for other things. Therefore, a good video card will make Vista work better.



Vista uses extra RAM to store commonly used files in a new activity known as “disk caching”. The computer uses artificial intelligence to determine which files will be used most and copies it to RAM (where it is much faster than accessing your hard disk). This includes components of the programs you use on a regular basis. When you need more RAM for programs you launch, etc. the computer purges the “least likely used” files from RAM to make room for the new program. That’s why if you look at the performance monitor, Vista always has near zero “free” RAM. So in theory, the more RAM (for disk cache) you have, the faster your computer will operate. This can also be augmented (to a lesser effect) with a flash drive/card with a technology called ReadyBoost. Just stick it in and select “Speed up my system” and leave it there.

http://www.anandtech.com/systems/showdoc.aspx?i=2917&p=6



Vista Home Premium and Ultimate has Windows Media Center, where with a TV card/USB adapter (if not integrated) of the type that fits your TV/Cable, acts similar to TiVo. You can play your videos, schedule recordings, etc. You can get a wireless keyboard / mouse or gyro-mouse and it will be sort of like remote control. If you do this, get a big Hard Disk.



MS Office productivity software works best on Windows. The Mac version is really nerfed and doesn’t have new features like Office Ribbon interface, Mini Toolbars, and Live Preview, among a large list. There are also less individual titles in the Mac version.



Vista supports touch-screens and voice recognition if you’re into note-taking and dictation. A good program to use with this is OneNote, which is included in some Office editions.



Deals of America and Tech Bargains catch good deals on HP and Dell’s and sometimes you can get like $500 off! XPBargains has deals and coupons on Tablet PC’s!



Unless you are an artist, most Universities (and programs) as well as the rest of the world use Windows. WinMacs are popular but for the price, Macs don’t run Windows as well as other brands, but sometimes it doesn't really matter that much to most users. In addition some just want it for fashion and like them to match their iPods.



Here are some statistics to put it into perspective.

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/

Note that these “internet traffic statistics” actually miss a lot of Windows PC usage because many are used for work and do not surf the internet much (if at all). Thus the Windows PC’s out there may be even MORE than the representation on the charts!



Macs are durable because many have an accelerometer in there that can "increase the chance" of saving your hard drive when you drop it. Like those used in airbags. The power cord is also magnetically attached so it reduces the chance that you yank it off the table.



OSXMacs can exclusively install Final Cut Pro (which is good for media work). Adobe Creative Suite is also good and available for Windows but works better on OSX. The Windows version actually looks like an OSX port. Many OSX users are artists historically. Emotion workers are generally not as good with computers as logic workers so OSX is good for them. Because OSX is less complicated and harder to mess up, a lot of computer newbies also use Macs and that’s why you see a lot of “Get a Mac! They are so awesome!” without any technical explanation to back up that opinion. ;)



Mac Pros:

OSX stability

OSX is easy to use

Dual-bootable to Windows

More durable than many brands

Trendy



Mac Cons:

Not as much peripheral support

Not as much software support

Windows doesn’t run as well

Expensive

Minority



Windows PC Pros:

More customizable

More choices

More styles

Cheap hardware

Vista has best gaming capability (Direct3D 10)



Windows PC Cons:

Less stable (unless you are an IT pro)

Many are relatively not as fashionable

Not as user-friendly

Some extra features in Windows requires advanced knowledge to use

The extra features require better hardware despite your use of them or not



Details of features can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X



Some brand statistics: In terms of recent sales, the top 3 manufacturers are HP, Dell, and Acer (Gateway). Apple is #4 in USA.

http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/04/24/mac-q1-2008-market-share-3-26-percent-worldwide-6-26-percent-in-the-us.aspx



Pretty good deal on a powerful laptop: $900 - Gateway M-6851 NoteBook Intel Core 2 Duo T5550(1.83GHz) 15.4" Wide XGA 4GB Memory DDR2 667 250GB HDD 5400rpm Dual layer DVD Burner ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600(512MB GDDR3 Dedicated Memory)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834101154



Pretty good deals on mid to powerful Tablet PC’s: $700 - Gateway C-141X / $1100 - Gateway C142XL

http://www.gateway.com/systems/series/529597319.php?mtr=DCYAONANC&sg=hm&ph1=8667187749
mahyarsv
2008-07-08 04:09:05 UTC
It's realy depend on your computer hardware , if you have 1GB or 2 GB RAM you can use vista and u will enjoy because the environment graphic and the searching tools in vista is exciting and by the way you have more compatibility with office 2007 .... if u use it you never use any other OS ... but if your computer hardware is not support required setting or if you want to run server programs such as SQL SERVER or programing tools such as visual studio I recommand windows xp proffesional ....
anonymous
2008-07-08 04:01:51 UTC
windows xp for performance but it depends what you like. But i prefer, xp i am just abouts to downgrade my sisters laptop from vista to xp
rrhakim
2008-07-08 03:56:48 UTC
Bil Gates said that the later is the better one.

and the choice is up to you. i think its depend on what thing u need. maybe u like the nice look of vista, but lets consider the system requirement. i keep my windows XP with me, its easy and still last maybe 2 or 3 more years.

But u have learn a little about vista. maybe someday noone use xp anymore:-)



visit indonesia..
Kalpak K
2008-07-08 03:52:45 UTC
I would recommend XP as i have both amd i have a better gaming and soft waring experience on XP. But it depends on you mind which one you want.
K!NkY--> ThE ProUd IndiaN
2008-07-08 03:51:47 UTC
Windows XP
poebassman
2008-07-08 04:05:27 UTC
It depends on what you like the best. Performance or Eye Candy.



Performance ... XP hands down because it doesn't have the eye-candy.



Eye-candy... Vista hands down because XP doesn't have the eye-candy.



Vista can perform well on Dual or Quad cores well with 4 gb RAM for 32 bit and 8 gb for 64 bit. The issue is that you need a bigger faster box to put Vista on if you want performance and eye-candy. XP... doesn't require a bigger faster box just a two to three year old P4 Motherboard, 7200 RPM or better HD, 1 gb RAM, 128mg Video or better for GREAT performance.



If you take eye-candy off of Vista to make it perform better... why use Vista?



64 bit OSes such as XP 64 or Vista 64 bit versions help increase performance... up to 30% greater but they require a 64 bit processor such as the Dual or Quad cores that support Vista. They may have some driver or application issues such as peripheral device drivers or Flash player but those are getting smaller as each day passes. On the 64 bit box, you can use 32 bit apps though.



Again... its really about what you want from the OS... Performance or Eye-candy or.... how much you are willing to spend to get Performance and Eye-candy on one box.



Buy a bigger box and put Vista on it... it will perform well and have great eye-candy. Use an existing relatively new box with XP and it will perform well without the eye-candy.



Vista changes many interfaces such as networking and sharing that does take some getting use to but so did XP over Win2k Pro or WinME.



I have at home two Vista boxes (home 64 bit and Business 32 bit versions, 5 XP 32 bit Desktops (4 home and 1 Pro) and 3 XP Laptops (2 home, 1 Pro).



I use them about equally.
Blue Magic
2008-07-08 03:54:26 UTC
xp operating system CD-ROM cost more than vista
Danny
2008-07-08 03:57:54 UTC
XP, it runs everything alot faster and smoother than vista does. vista needs alot more computing power to do the same things xp can do


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...